Can the Jackson Council Add a Resolution On The Fly

It depends who you ask.

At the February 13th meeting, Jackson’s council refused to consider a resolution condemning anti-semitism, with Council President Robert Nixon saying that the council is “legally prohibited from passing a resolution, as it hadn’t issued the proper public notice”.

But is this accurate? It depends who you ask: on the one hand Council President Robert Nixon says that a resolution must be on the public agenda before the meeting.

nixonresolution2

An entirely different opinion comes out though if you ask someone else, namely Council President Robert Nixon. Here a resolution is walked in during the meeting to oppose a gas tax increase.

nixonresolution1

After he announces the new resolution, Township Attorney Jean Cipriani backs him up, saying that “the agenda is in control of the chair, and if something happens on an emerging basis or a recent basis there is no problem adding it to the agenda”.

Hopefully all these people can get on the same page next time. While meetings and ordinances up for adoption need to be publicly noticed, the law explicitly states that a resolution “may be finally passed at the meeting at which it is introduced.”


resolutionvsordinance


 

Westlake Lawsuit Continues

Judge refuses to dismiss disability lawsuit brought by rabbi asking for easier access to religious services.

Yesterday, a judge declined to dismiss most counts against the Westlake Golf & Country Club in Jackson in a lawsuit brought by Rabbi Philip Lefkowitz. He and his sons, who live with him, are handicapped and had been denied accommodation of their disability by Westlake in refusing to allow them to build a screened porch on their house for use as a Sukkah as well as access to a gate that would allow them to attend religious services. Rabbi Lefkowitz sued under the Fair Housing Act, NJ’s Law Against Discrimination, and NJ’s Planned Real Estate Development Full Disclosure Act.

After the lawsuit was filed, Westlake relented on the screened porch, a feature which other houses in the development have as well. However, they asked the court to dismiss the rabbi’s request for access to the gate and construction of a small path leading to the gate as accommodations that these laws do not require them to allow. In an ruling yesterday the judge let most of the counts stand though, dismissing one and consolidating two others, but leaving in counts that would require both the path construction and gate access. The suit will now proceed to discovery and trial unless it is settled first.

And Behind the Mask..

Who is the “Jackson Taxpayer Alliance”?

As reported by the Asbury Park Press, a number of the more offensive campaign ads from this election season were paid for by a group called the “Jackson Taxpayer Alliance”.

jackson_mailer

But who heads this mysterious organization, dedicated to “taxpayer advocacy” and bringing political discourse to new lows. Well the filings say:

<DRUM ROLL>

Raymond Cattonar, former candidate for Jackson council and current Jackson “watchdog”, with a budget of 10 thousand big ones!

<GASP?>

It’s Election Time!

“Lakewood Developers” gone wild

This year, it’s all about Orthodox Jews Lakewood Developers:
“Lakewood Developers” with their special “developer” hats on.
“Democrats Giving Money to Democratic Candidate”. Also, hamming it up with some “Lakewood Developers”!

“VAAD: Yostpille for Mayor”. Whoever made this flyer though doesn’t seem to realize that Yiddish is read right-to-left and that Google Translate is not very good at spelling.

A photo of the secret closed meeting connecting Yostpille to the VAAD. VAAD member circled by the original author in case it wasn’t immediately obvious.
Come on in “Lakewood Developers” and your “Lakewood Developer” families.
“Constituent Leaves Campaign Office”. Good thing this was caught and reported by a local Jew-watcher.
“Lakewood Developers” and their Rabbinical Societies are always building those Kollels.
yostpille3
The secret cabal of “Lakewood Democrats” behind Tracie Yostpille’s campaign. Keep all those “Lakewood Democrats” out!
As the old adage goes, “Behind your enemies: the Jew.”

Lets Get Real

Are overdevelopment and ties to outside organizations valid concerns? Of course.

Is everyone involved in the political attacks above a rabid anti-semite? Unlikely.

But it seems clear to us that these political pieces are not about providing information to voters, they are about inciting fear by showing opposing candidates near someone in a black skullcap, Yiddish text, and/or the word “Lakewood”.

Stop invoking the specter of Orthodox Jews to scare people. It increases hatred and division and is bound to backfire when someone snaps a picture of your candidate next to someone who happens to be Jewish.

Update: And Behind the Mask…

Reasonable Accommodation

Much like for religious beliefs, special arrangements may need to be made to preserve the rights of those with handicaps. The protections provided by the Fair Housing Act require that a disabled person be allowed to make physical modifications to their home and exceptions to housing related policies as needed to “afford such person full enjoyment of the premises”:

(3) For purposes of this subsection, discrimination includes–

(A) a refusal to permit, at the expense of the handicapped person, reasonable modifications of existing premises occupied or to be occupied by such person if such modifications may be necessary to afford such person full enjoyment of the premises, except that, in the case of a rental, the landlord may where it is reasonable to do so condition permission for a modification on the renter agreeing to restore the interior of the premises to the condition that existed before the modification, reasonable wear and tear excepted.

(B) a refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling;

A recent letter (shown below) sent by an attorney retained by Rabbi Philip Lefkowitz, a handicapped homeowner in the Westlake Golf & Country Club of Jackson, details the rabbi’s travails in trying to get the homeowners association to afford him full enjoyment of his house. If allowed access to an existing gate in a common area, it would enable him to attend religious services without pushing his wheelchair on a busy road. His requests to build a screened porch which could be used for religious observance were denied, despite other houses having a similar porch. And recently, the association bylaws were amended in a manner that would seem to prevent him from worshipping with a group at in his home:

1.38 (New) “Residential purposes” shall mean used solely as a place to live. Holding or conducting regular meetings, presentations, assemblies or other gatherings, to which members of the public are invited, shall not constitute a residential purpose and are prohibited. For purposes of this restriction “members of the public” shall mean individuals other than personal friends and members of a resident’s family.

Now, we’re sure there are perfectly perfunctory reasons for all this: the gate was intended for emergency vehicles only, screened porches are only allowed on some models of homes in Westlake but not others, and the association board had a sudden but unrelated need to clarify the word “residential” in their bylaws.

But to what end does the homeowners association continue to deny what seem like otherwise reasonable accommodations to a disabled resident?

Two Sides to Every Story

A social media controversy over a speed bus was flipped on its head by new video evidence.

villanovabus
Original Facebook post

A recent video on Facebook sought to bring attention to a speeding bus on Villanova Drive and shows the vehicle swerving in the direction of the camera while driving past. The poster alleged that the driver had intentionally changed course towards him as a means of intimidation. A followup showed the driver receiving a ticket the next day for speeding.

This seemed like the end of the story, until the Lakewood Scoop shed new light on the incident with a post containing dash-cam videos from the bus company. This new video shows that in addition to the original poster standing behind a tree on the side of the street, there is a second person, unseen in the original video, blocking part of the street. The bus was actually forced towards the curb (and the camera) to move away from this person in the street. It almost seems like a set-up designed to capture the original video.

Below are two police reports associated with this incident:

The police were called to Villanova Drive around 3:00 PM on 2/15, the day after the first video, where a number of residents claimed that a speed bus had swerved towards them, a claim which would seem to be contradicted by the dash-cam video. The officer then stayed in the area, giving a citation to the driver when he passed later.

New Lawsuit Filed Against Jackson Township

Religious discrimination and harassment alleged by new suit.

As reported this morning by the Asbury Park Press, a new religious discrimination lawsuit has been filed in federal court against Jackson Township, this time by a private homeowner. The suit alleges that Council President Robert Nixon and various unidentified township employees worked together under the guise of zoning enforcement to stalk and harass the occupants of a home in Jackson for doing nothing more than hosting prayer services, in violation of the US Constitution, the NJ Constitution and RLUIPA. This seems to be entirely distinct from the lawsuit filed by Agudath Israel last year over school, dormitory and eruv bans.

The complaint filed in court is available below: